MLIM witness in Unilever case admits to &quotmistake&quot

Under cross-examination in the Unilever case, Merrill Lynch Investment Managers' (MLIM's) final witness dismissed a damaging sentence he had included in a set of speaking notes as &quota mistake&quot, written when he was &quotin a rush&quot.

Peter Stanyer, head of performance and risk management at MLIM, drafted a set of speaking notes for Carol Galley, head of MLIM's London business, for a meeting with Unilever on May 13, 1997. The meeting was called after the portfolio had seriously underperformed, and Galley proposed a recovery plan.

WSJ Logo
Pro Bono or Pro Nono? Law Firms Split on Fulfilling Deals With TrumpExternal link

Pro Bono or Pro Nono? Law Firms Split on Fulfilling Deals With Trump